|
What
makes a person choose between legal and illegal means to
work abroad? What
makes him/her prefer to work legally or illegally during
his/her stay in a foreign country?
This
case study aims to explore the factors, which push and
pull unskilled Filipino migrant workers to resort to
illegal migration in the Republic of Korea.
The variables considered are: (1) structural
factors, such as the labor supply side push factors, and
labor demand side pull factors; (2) systemic factors, such
as the migration policy of the labor-sending and
-receiving countries; and (3) institutional factors, such
as family, government agencies directly involved in
overseeing international labor migration matters,
recruitment agencies, religious groups, and non-government
organizations.
The
research assumed that the Korean government policy of
accepting unskilled foreign workers through the Korean
Federation of Small and Medium Business (KFSMB) Trainee
Scheme, under the Korean Alien Industrial Technology
Training Program (AITTP), serves as a “push” factor
for workers to choose illegal work.
This
case study is a survey of Filipino unskilled migrant
workers in Seoul, Korea.
The actual survey was conducted on 17 October to 7
November 1999, and a total of 53 respondents were
interviewed using structured questionnaires prepared in
Pilipino. The respondents were classified into three
types: (1) trainees, who have legal work status; (2)
runaway trainees who entered Korea legally as trainees,
and left the company where they were assigned to work;
thus, considered illegal workers; and (3) illegal entrants
who entered Korea through a tourist visa, stayed in the
country beyond the duration allowed, and were working at
the time of the survey.
The
major findings are as follows:
-
The main purpose for working abroad is financial, and
the reason is directed toward improving one’s living
condition. About
one-fourth (24.7%) of the respondents cited financial
reasons. Others
were more specific, such as to get a higher income job
(19.2%), or support one’s family dependents and send
them to school (19.2%).
-
Almost 20% of the responses of illegal workers pertain
to the intention of merely seeking adventure, or to
get away from personal problems.
-
About 34.4% of the total responses cited that Korea
was chosen as a country of destination primarily
because of the easy and faster process of entry,
regardless whether the means utilized was legal or
otherwise. The
presence of friends and relatives, who provide
information and assistance in finding jobs, was also a
contributing factor for workers to choose Korea among
other alternative destinations.
-
The training allowance received by trainees is about
50% less than what the illegal workers commonly get.
However, foreign workers in general were paid
wages averaging just a little over half of those of
Korean workers.
-
Half of the trainees (six respondents) reported that
they get as much as 600,001 to 700,000 Korean Won,
while most of the illegal workers (14 respondents, or
37%) are paid as high as 900,001 to 1.5 million Korean
Won. Evidently,
the big difference in salary level is a “pull”
factor for workers or trainees to go illegal.
-
The major problem mentioned by majority, 54 percent of
the trainees and 33 percent of the illegal workers,
revolves around problems on the terms and conditions
of work. The
low salary of trainees is the main reason given by
runaway trainees for deserting their legal work
status.
-
The most common coping mechanism adopted by all the
respondents to solve their problems is practicing
tolerance, diplomacy, patience and resignation to
their difficult situation.
The church and migrant workers’ organizations
are perceived to effectively respond to and assist
Filipino migrant workers in Korea.
-
The forced savings policy in the trainee scheme is a
deterring factor for trainees not to run away from the
job contract. Some
trainees favorably look upon it as a good way to help
them save money they can use for the future.
-
A relatively higher salary and freedom to choose the
kind of job he/she wants and being able to do whatever
he/she wants are the major reasons workers would
prefer to keep their illegal work status.
-
Security in terms of job tenure, and payment of salary
of a trainee status are influencing factors mentioned
by illegal workers who would prefer to have a legal
work status. This
is favored more than being constantly at risk and
afraid of being caught, or thrown out of work.
-
Comments about not having the liberty to move around
were raised by both the trainees and illegal workers,
including runaway trainees.
Some trainees say they are restricted by their
employers, fearing they will run away, while the
illegal workers also experience the same limitation
and constraints of not being able to freely move
around, for fear of being caught.
-
Based on comments raised by most of the respondents,
the trainee scheme is generally looked upon by both
the legal and illegal workers as not effective largely
due to the incidence of contract violations.
The
underlying factors that push and pull workers to resort to
illegal migration are the structural problems existing in
the Philippines and Korea.
The poor economic conditions in the Philippines, as
manifested by poverty, income inequality and high rate of
unemployment, give the workers in the labor supply side
push factors to seek employment opportunities abroad,
despite the costs, especially if illegal means are used.
On
the one hand, Korea provides a labor demand side pull
factor, with their demands for unskilled labor needed by
their small and medium manufacturing sector, and other
sectors. The
short supply of young people in Korea’s labor force who
are not willing to take on the 3D jobs, combined with the
high educational attainment of their workforce have
resulted in pressure to resort to unskilled foreign labor.
All these imply that labor migration is basically
economically motivated.
Immediate
factors, however, exist that can give trigger push or pull
effects on workers to choose illegal migration.
These are the systemic factors in the form of the
labor migration policy of both the labor-sending and
labor-receiving countries.
The net effect could either be to encourage or
discourage workers to choose illegal entry or resort to
illegal work.
|