|
The
construction industry undeniably is beset with a lot of
problems on safety and health.
There are fatal or very serious accidents in a
number of construction sites, most of which are
preventable, if only there could be better awareness on
safety and health rules and regulations, good safety and
health attitudes and practices.
These are essentials in ensuring that construction
projects are implemented in sites where there is
observance of safety and health requirements and effective
implementation of safety and health programs.
While
there are tripartite efforts to improve the status of
safety and health in construction sites, these are
traditionally training interventions and information
campaign, based on the very basic assumption that there is
a large gap in the knowledge and awareness of workers,
supervisors and managers on the safety and health
considerations in construction.
Knowledge, of course is a big issue, but the unsafe
acts and conditions that lead to accidents and injuries
are not only a function of knowledge but also of
prevailing attitudes and practices.
The
significance of this study is to be able to provide a
baseline on the current levels of KAP of workers and
supervisors/ managers in construction sites, which is
valuable in the formulation of policies, strategies and
interventions to better address the safety and health
concerns. The
interplay of the three elements (knowledge, attitudes and
practices) is also an important aspect to look into to
have a better package of safety and health interventions
for the construction industry.
This
particular survey involved a total of 362 respondent
workers and supervisors/ managers in 17 construction sites
in 5 areas in Metropolitan Manila (Quezon City, Makati,
Taguig, Mandaluyong and Manila).
It was the intention of the study to have sites
representing low-rise (3 floors and below), medium-rise
(4-6 floors) and high-rise (7 floors and above)
construction. Seven
small, 6 medium and 4 large construction sites were
visited for the survey.
The
study initially prioritized workers in the following types
of work: steel
works, masonry, carpentry, equipment operator.
However in the course of the study, a significant
number of laborers or utility personnel and other types of
work (e.g., electricians, time keepers, etc.) were
involved in the survey and focused group discussions.
Relevant
findings in the survey show that in relation to safety and
health, generally,
70.0% to 90.3% of supervisors and workers regardless of
type of work have fair level of knowledge.
The majority of the supervisors/ managers or 77.0%
and equipment operator (51.6%) have generally good
attitudes, while the other groups of workers, ranging from
25.8% to 45.1%, have fair levels of attitudes.
As to practices, most supervisors/ managers (62.3%)
and workers (51.7% to 58.8%) have good practices, except
masonry workers and those belonging to the others group
where only 42.9% ad 44.0%, respectively, have good
practices.
The
qualitative part of the study through the focused group
discussions (FGDs) showed that the level of knowledge of
the supervisors/ managers and the different groups of
workers leave so much to be desired.
Even most supervisors are not aware of existing
safety and health standards.
Only a few have heard about the DOLE Department
Order No. 13: Guidelines
Governing Safety and Health in the Construction Industry.
Twelve
FGDs were conducted involving 21 supervisors and 70
workers. Three
FGDs were for supervisors, 4 for carpentry workers, 2 each
for steel workers and equipment operators and 1 for
masonry workers. In
terms of construction size, the FGDs conducted were as
follows: 3
for small, 3 for medium and 6 for large.
The
findings of the study would provide good inputs to both
government and private organizations in modifying
occupational safety and health policies and programs and
developing new ones to improve the overall status of
safety and health in the constructions sites.
More particularly, the results of the study could
give better insights to the Department of Labor and
Employment in carrying out the provisions of the
Department Order No. 13.
|