|
This
paper traces the labor and employment situation from 2001
to 2003, with particular focus on the employment
contributions of the social partners – government,
business and labor. The
Report explains the situation of a “jobless growth”.
The economy grew by 4.6 percent in 2002 but generated only
906,000 new jobs vis-à-vis the 1.1 million increase in
the labor force. The same is true in 2003 when economy
grew by 4.5 percent but created only a measly 565,000 new
jobs against some 624,000 new entrants and re-entrants to
the labor force. This
inability of the local economy to create enough employment
opportunities combined with the faster growth of the labor
force caused unemployment to increase further. From 3.653
million in 2001, unemployed persons increased to 3.942
million in 2003; average unemployment rate for period was
11.3 percent.
The
rate of employment growth was on the downtrend: from 6.2
percent in 2001 to 3.1 percent in 2002 to 1.9 percent in
2003. Also, the underemployment rate or the magnitude of
employed persons who remain unsatisfied with their income
and seek additional hours of work posted an increase of
200,000, from 5.0 million in 2001 to 5.2 million in 2004
or a 17 percent underemployment rate.
Overseas
employment, together with the export performance of the
electronic sector, served as the saving grace to the
lackluster economic performance during the three-year
period. Despite the uncertainties brought about by global
events such as the war in
Iraq
, the SARS outbreak, and the growing competition from
other labor-sending countries, the
Philippines
generated a total of 2,624 million jobs over the
three-year period. Overseas Filipino workers likewise
remitted approximately US$21 billion.
Four
strategies to combat unemployment are outlined in the
paper:
Enhancing
Employment.
This means improving both the quality of the workforce in
terms of competencies, productivity and work values, and
the quality of employment in terms of conditions,
remuneration, and welfare. It basically calls for measures
that would improve the general quality and efficiency of
education and training, and reorienting education and
training toward the industry’s manpower requirements.
Facilitating
Employment.
Interventions in this regard are directed at developing
and improving access to employment opportunities and
alternatives both local and abroad, and providing accurate
and updated labor market information to improve skills and
job matching.
Preserving
Employment.
The objective is to prevent job losses as a result of
closures, strikes and lockouts, and other forms of
termination of employment.
Achievements in this area include the organization
of 20 industry tripartite councils that covered 9,808
workers from 903 establishments, forging of seven social
accords, and improvement in the disposition rates of
actual strikes from 92.3 percent (35 out of 39) in 2002 to
100 percent (41 out of 41) in 2003.
Generating
Employment.
To provide for more job opportunities, the government has
created an environment where business and investments will
thrive; provided alternative employment or livelihood
activities and pump-priming activities, and facilitated
overseas deployment of workers to friendly host
countries.
The
paper emphasizes that improving the country’s employment
levels should remain a priority of the government as it is
crucial to poverty alleviation, reducing income
inequality, as well as addressing other socio-economic
ills afflicting Philippine society.
|